Minister Barbara Creecy visits the National Zoological Gardens of South Africa

Minister Barbara Creecy visits the National Zoological Gardens of South Africa

On Thursday 4 August 2022, the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries, and the Environment Ms Barbara Creecy, joined by board members of South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) and management visited the National Zoological Gardens (NZG) of South Africa to review the facility’s contribution to biodiversity, research, scientific services, animal welfare, conservation, tourism, and public awareness.

The Chairperson of the SANBI Board, Professor Edward Nesamvuni, welcomed the visit by the Minister as it afforded the Minister the opportunity to gain greater insights into SANBI’s cutting edge foundational research and scientific services, particularly those activities that contribute positively on policy action, wildlife regulatory services and associated enforcement and compliance.

“SANBI’s work on research and scientific services which include genetics and DNA profiling, veterinary services, and the Biobank contributes significantly to biodiversity information, species conservation, biodiversity and health, and the wildlife economy, as well as combating wildlife crime,” said Minister Barbara Creecy.

During her visit, the Minister had the opportunity to see facilities which include the state of the art equipment used for the development of marker-based systems to advance genomic research at the Centre for Conservation Science. The work includes Next-Generation Sequencing, developing genetic approaches to conducting phylogenetic assessments (using full mitochondrial genomes or regions of nuclear and mitochondrial sequence) within and among taxa, in order to understand evolutionary processes, and patterns as well as to identify species, units within species, management units or cryptic species. Outcomes of this process are valuable in ensuring informed conservation measures for species that are subjected to a variety of threats.

In the Genetics Services Unit, the Minister saw the tools, technologies and guidelines that are applied in wildlife forensics and are used to expand DNA wildlife databases to ensure effective compliance, defensible and credible forensic testing to mitigate wildlife crime and contribute to the management of wildlife trade.

“Through research, novel genetic tools are applied for the identification of hybrids in a variety of wildlife species with model thresholds for genetic testing,” explained Professor Ramagwai Sebola, Chief Director: Foundational Biodiversity Science at SANBI. “This is a service rendered to SANParks, provincial conservation authorities/agencies and to the wildlife industry to maintain the genetic integrity and to inform the genetic status of wildlife populations.”

The Minister also visited the animal hospital and veterinary unit which handles animal operations and post-mortems using high technology equipment.

During the visit, the Minister was given a tour of the facilities that demonstrate SANBI’s commitment to a One Health approach which focuses on the distribution, prevalence and epidemiology of pathogens and the development of a database in order to assess risks and impact to develop response strategies for wildlife disease threats. The visit included the Biobank where biological materials are conserved for future research and decision making that contributes to species conservation.

In line with the commemoration of the inaugural Marine Protected Areas Day, on 1 August 2022, the Minister visited the aquarium, the largest inland aquarium in South Africa, and reiterated the importance of protecting marine ecosystems for ecological, social and economic purposes.

Source: Government of South Africa

Information Regulator establishes Enforcement Committee

The Information Regulator (Regulator) has reached yet another milestone with the establishment of its Enforcement Committee.

The Enforcement Committee is established in terms of section 50 of the Protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013 (POPIA) and will be chaired by Adv Helen Fourie SC and Simonè Margadie will serve as the alternative Chairperson.

Adv Helen Fourie SC is a member of the Pretoria Society of Advocates and has served as an acting Judge in the North Gauteng High Court.

Her Senior Counsel status was conferred by the President of South Africa in 2018. The focus of Fourie’s practice is providing advice and conducting litigation in matters concerning various aspects of insolvency law, corporate law, contractual disputes, National Credit Act, wills and estates and trusts, interdicts, and evictions.

Margadie is an attorney and holds a Master of Laws degree in Corporate and Commercial Law and was admitted as an attorney of the High Court of South Africa on 12 April 2001.

She currently serves on the panel of the Law Society of the Northern Provinces. She previously served on the panel of the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) and the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS).

The Enforcement Committee comprises 14 independent experts drawn from a wide array of professional backgrounds such as law, information security, education, finance accounting, auditing, actuarial science, forensics and criminal investigations.

Section 93 of POPIA provides that the Enforcement Committee must consider all matters referred to it by the Regulator regarding a complaint, an investigation of a complaint, a finding in respect of the complaint, and as referred to in section 92 of POPIA, other matters or a recommendation in respect of the proposed action to be taken by the Regulator.

The matters to be referred to the Enforcement Committee also include any matter regarding a complaint in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA).

The Enforcement Committee is required to make findings in respect of matters referred to it.

POPIA further provides that the Enforcement Committee may make any recommendation to the Regulator necessary or incidental to any action that should be taken against a responsible party in terms of POPIA or an information officer or head of a private body in terms PAIA.

“The inauguration of the Enforcement Committee is a historic moment for the Regulator.

“For the first time since its establishment in 2016, the Regulator will be able to enforce its powers and provide an effective remedy to the complainants whose right to privacy and the right of access to information have been infringed,”said Chairperson of the Regulator Adv. Pansy Tlakula speaking at the induction session for the Enforcement Committee.

The establishment of the Enforcement Committee is a shot in the arm to the Regulator’s efforts aimed at confronting the increasing volume of complaints by the public regarding the processing of their personal information by responsible parties or the denial of access to information by public or private bodies.

In the twelve months since the enforcement powers of the Regulator came into force, 150 access to information complaints and 544 protection of personal information complaints have been submitted to the Regulator.

The Enforcement Committee will play a critical role in resolving some of these cases if they are not resolved at the earlier phases of the case management processes, such as the pre-investigation, investigation and mediation phases.

Source: South African Government News Agency

Employment and Labour on key risks associated to handling asbestos

A management plan is key to risks associated to handling asbestos – Department of Employment and Labour

While the Asbestos Abatement Regulations 2020 does not prescribe the cut-off date for the removal of any asbestos containing material in workplaces, it is the duty of every employer to have a management plan in place.

Addressing stakeholders on the Asbestos Abatement Regulations, Department of Employment and Labour Specialist: Occupational Health & Hygiene Elize Lourens said every organisation need to develop its own policy and target date to remove the asbestos.

“Where the removal of asbestos or repair of asbestos-containing material is conducted, organisations need to have own management plan and inspectors need to see the plan when conducting inspections”, Lourens said.

She said an asbestos management plan was a critical component of a risk assessment plan.

According to the Asbestos Abatement Regulations 2020 – the asbestos management plan must include at least the following: a procedure that contains at least measures related to the repair, removal and management of asbestos-containing materials; and the implementation of the Regulations for Prohibition of the Use, Manufacturing, Import and Export of Asbestos and Asbestos-containing Materials.

The Regulations further specify that if asbestos-containing materials are identified, as required in regulation 3, the employer or self-employed person must ensure that a written asbestos management plan for the workplace is prepared by a competent person.

Lourens was speaking during the Asbestos Abatement Regulations workshop held at the Milnerton Public Library in Cape Town today, 04 August 2022. The workshop was part of a stakeholder engagement to provide a practical guidance to registered asbestos contractors and asbestos clients on the legislation and legal requirements.

Department of Employment and Labour Senior Specialist: Occupational Health and Hygiene Bulelwa Huna cautioned on the economic costs of poor OHS practices, saying this affects both employer and employee – in terms of medical and rehabilitation costs and for employees and the loss of income for employees. Huna said safety and health in the workplace is a fundamental right that cannot be taken or given away.

She reiterated that every employer shall provide and maintain, as far as is reasonably practicable a working environment that is safe and without risks. Huna said leadership plays a crucial role in the successful implementation of a health and safety management system.

Risk assessment was one of the key tools for improving OHS conditions at work – and this will contribute to the protection of employees by employers and minimise work related hazards.

The five step methodology in risk assessment include: identifying the hazards, identify who might be harmed, evaluate the risk, record who is responsible for implementing and record the findings.

For more information, contact:

Teboho Thejane – Departmental Spokesperson

Cell: 082 697 0694

Email: Teboho.Thejane@labour.gov.za

Source: Government of South Africa

Minister Thulas Nxesi: Presidential Social Sector Summit 2022

Presidential Social Sector Summit 2022 “Fostering social cohesion to enable socio-economic participation in communities” Birchwood Conference Centre

Input by TW Nxesi MP Minister of Employment and Labour: “Moving towards social compacting: from concept to practice”

Protocol:

Programme director

Minister of Social Development

Minister of Health

The Premier of Gauteng province

Government leaders and officials

Representatives of labour and business

Most importantly representatives of the social sector and civil society: non-profit organisations, community-based organisation, faith-based organisations – all those who on a daily basis, in difficult conditions, support people in need and strive to combat poverty, hunger, disease and social ills

Ladies and gentlemen

Thank you for inviting me to participate in this important occasion. Allow me to acknowledge President Ramaphosa for initiating this process and Minister Zulu and her team for organizing it.

Let me begin with a moment of reflection: you will know that this Summit was scheduled to take place three years ago…. Then came the Covid19 pandemic. Cast your mind back to the early days of the pandemic:

we didn’t know what it was

family and friends were getting infected

we were scared

over 100,000 fellow South Africans died…. But as a society we survived and in some ways grew stronger.

Let me list some of the positives to emerge from the pandemic which are of direct relevance to this Summit:

I believe that social solidarity was strengthened – symbolized by the nightly loud demonstrations in support of medical personnel on the front line of combatting the pandemic.

Social solidarity also took a more concrete monetary form:

The Solidarity Fund

The UIF Ters Covid19 benefit payments for workers laid off due to the lockdown;

More broadly the Social Development Grants – availed to people who had never before qualified for state support.

Of course the pandemic also exposed massive gaps in our systems of social protection:

UIF was geared up to cater only for the traditional employment relationship of employer and employee. It offered nothing to those in new forms of work – the gig economy, the so-called self-employed, precarious work etc. Nedlac is seized with addressing this issue.

Whole sections of our society – particularly the informal sector – remain outside the net of social protection.

I believe that, as a society, we are emerging from the pandemic – and let us not forget that the Covid19 is still with us – but we have a much clearer understanding of the need to support each other in the face of persistent unemployment and poverty.

One final lesson: we have seen that internationally, in their response to the pandemic, some societies tore themselves apart. This did not happen in South Africa where we were able to mount an ‘all-of-society’ response to the pandemic. This was in large part, I believe, due to our long tradition of social dialogue and social compacting:

Exemplified by the Codesa process, and

Institutionalized in our collective bargaining system and Nedlac.

It was Nedlac which facilitated this ‘all-of-society’ response to the pandemic bringing together the social partners – labour, business, the social sector and government – to agree on major interventions to cushion the broader citizenry from the adverse effects of Covid-19 and the lockdowns.

It is against this background – 30 years of social dialogue and the experiences of the pandemic – that the President, at the beginning of this year, called for engagement and a new social compact to address the socio-economic challenges facing South Africa. This Summit, I believe, is an important part of that process.

Social compacting

Since the onset of democracy South Africa’s social partners have sought to forge social compacts. At a national level, these include:

the 1999 Jobs Summit,

the 2003 Growth and Development Summit,

the 2008/9 Framework Agreement,

a series of five social accords on specific themes adopted between 2011 and 2013,

the 2018 Jobs Summit Agreement,

the 2019 Eskom social compact, and more recently

the 2020 Economic Recovery and Reconstruction Framework (ERRP).

The process of developing a social compact is one of bringing together stakeholders with sometimes conflicting interests and agendas. It is therefore a process that requires parties to be willing to compromise and not be married to their positions. Ultimately, every society must decide on the values and principles that are most important and the social compact should facilitate their realisation.

Social partners – government, labour, business and the community sector – and South Africans at large are compelled, at this critical juncture, to drive the recovery.

We all need to join hands and become more innovative in confronting the complex challenges we face and take the country onto a higher growth path. The aim should not merely be to ‘build back better’; but to go beyond where we were before the poly-crisis by ‘building forward differently’.

A new social compact must include meaningful trade-offs and demonstrate new progress in critical areas:

A new social compact should outline the principles of a “new consensus”, beyond merely specific actions or interventions.

This consensus must enable decisive action on interventions whose scale is large enough to place the country on a clear path of recovery.

The social compact should resolve the current impasse on long-standing areas of disagreement or stalemate, and should not only include issues where broad agreement already exists.

The agreement should build on the ERRP (Economic Reconstruction and Recovery Programme), but extend beyond it – it must be seen as a fresh approach that will shift the needle on economic growth.

The focus should be on fewer priorities (“big ticket items”) where consensus is required, not a laundry list of initiatives or a comprehensive plan – learning from the weaknesses of the ERRP.

The social compact must include commitments from each social partner, not only actions that government will take – but what all partners can contribute.

Key lessons and observations from our past compacting include:

the absence of an overarching vision to inform the individual efforts, and

the need for credible and clear growth which must feed into our approach as we move into bilateral and multilateral negotiations with social partners.

A further weakness of previous compacts was the poor monitoring and accountability mechanisms. Although this was a major focus in the 2018 Jobs Summit Framework – of holding all social partners accountable – and having some success through the monthly reporting meetings – this too had challenges in terms of ensuring that all partners accounted for their responsibilities. The Framework unfortunately came to a halt as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

We need a common understanding of our challenges and then having a common vision and shared set of values that places the collective and national interest above any sectional interests.

We must also endeavor not to leave anyone behind. We therefore need to broaden our consultation and participation wider and beyond Government and the NEDLAC social partners. It must also include an element of social protection – to support the most vulnerable sections of the society.

This Summit therefore comes at an opportune time for the Community Constituency, where you are able to broaden the mandate to take forward to the next consultations on Social Compacting at NEDLAC post the Summit.

I look forward to such engagements, and wish you well in your deliberations today and tomorrow.

Thank you.

Source: Government of South Africa

South African Health Products and Regulatory Authority update on Covid-19 Vaccine Janssen resulting in fatal case of Guillain-Barré Syndrome

On 31 March 2021, SAHPRA approved the use of the COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen for individuals 18 years of age and older as a single primary vaccination dose. COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen was later approved as a single booster dose given at least two months after the primary vaccination dose. On 22 December 2021, it was approved as a heterologous booster dose following completion of primary vaccination with a different COVID-19 vaccine. COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen is one of the vaccines provided in the national roll-out, which commenced on 17 May 2021. To date, 9 135 189 doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen have been administered in South Africa.

Monitoring the safety of all health products is one of SAHPRA’s key functions. In the case of vaccines, the Minister of Health has appointed a specialist committee, the National Immunisation Safety Expert Committee (NISEC), to specifically review and assess severe adverse events reported after immunisation and establish whether or not they are associated with the use of the vaccine. This is called causality assessment. SAHPRA works closely with both the National Department of Health and NISEC to ensure that all reported severe adverse events are firstly investigated by the provinces, and thereafter assessed for causality by NISEC. Against this background, SAHPRA has been informed of a fatal case of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen. Causality assessment of the reported case was conducted by the NISEC using the World Health Organization’s (WHO) methodology. The case was classified as a vaccine product-related event where immunisation with the COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen was associated with the occurrence of GBS in the vaccine recipient. The events reported in the vaccine recipient were consistent with the case definition for GBS and no other likely cause of GBS was identified at the time of illness.

GBS is a very rare but severe adverse event that is associated with the administration of various vaccines and other medicines and can also be triggered by infections such as SARS-CoV-2. GBS is a rare condition affecting the body’s immune system. Symptoms of GBS can vary from being mild to severe, and include muscle weakness, muscle pain, numbness, and tingling. In many cases, GBS gets better with no serious aftereffects but in some cases GBS can become serious and cause paralysis and other serious or life-threatening problems, such as breathing problems and abnormal blood pressure or heart rate. GBS-associated paralysis can require intense care with ventilatory support, which can be complicated by life-threatening infection.

Regulatory authorities have previously investigated reports of GBS associated with COVID-19 vaccines. In July 2021, the European Medicines Agency conducted a review of 108 suspected cases of GBS reported worldwide after 21 million people had received the COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen. They concluded that there is a possible increased risk and causal relationship between GBS occurrence and the COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen. GBS is therefore listed as a rare adverse event in the professional information (PI) for COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen.

Investigations and causality assessment of all severe reported adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) with the COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen and other COVID-19 vaccines is ongoing. An update on the outcome of these investigations and causality assessments will be shared with the public as they become available.

Source: Government of South Africa

Ministers Mondli Gungubele and Enoch Godongwana launch the Operation Vulindlela second quarter report, 5 Aug

Operation Vulindlela Second quarter report launch

Minister in the Presidency Mr Mondli Gungubele and Minister of Finance Mr Enoch Godongwana will launch the Operation Vulindlela second quarter report. The briefing follows on the one held on 13 May 2022, and will provide an update on reforms being implemented by departments supported by Operation Vulindlela. Operation Vulindlela is a joint initiative of the Presidency and the National Treasury, aimed at fast-tracking the delivery of structural economic reforms to unblock economic growth. Operation Vulindlela focuses on priority reforms in five areas: energy; digital communications; water; transport; and visa reform.

Details of the media briefing are as follows:

Date: 05 August 2022 Venue: Virtual

Time: 12:00 – 14:00

Register in advance for this webinar: https://gcis.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_-(link is external) cWU3_b4T9S-RlUG3E2Nqw

YouTube

@GovernmentZA / @National Treasury of the Republic of South Africa

Facebook

@South African Government / @National Treasury RSA

Twitter

GovernmentZA / @TreasuryRSA

Source: Government of South Africa

Gender Commission calls for speedy prosecution in the killing of two matric students

Gender Commission Calls for Speedy Prosecution In The Killing of Two Matric Students

The Commission for Gender Equality (CGE) is calling for a speedy prosecution following the killing of two high school learners in Ngwangwane village, in KwaZulu-Natal.

“We are deeply saddened that the lives of two bright students were mercilessly taken away and their bodies mutilated. We send our deepest condolences to the people of Ngwangwane village and the students at their former school,” said Ms Tamara Mathebula, the Chairperson of the Commission.

The Commission also applauds the South African Police Service in KwaZulu-Natal for moving with speed in apprehending the alleged perpetrator of this barbaric act. A successful prosecution in the shortest possible time will help restore faith in our judicial system.

Through our court monitoring process, we have observed that it is possible for speedy conclusion of a GBV matter if it is prioritised and given the attention it deserves.

The CGE urges all South Africans to join hands in fighting the scourge of violence, and in particular, gender-based violence. We need concerted efforts in addressing masculinity and patriarchy to eradicate the scourge of violence, especially gender-based violence.

Contact Person: Javu Baloyi (Spokesperson)

Email: media@cge.org.za(link is external)

Cell: 083 579 3306

Source: Government of South Africa